FINTECH CHARTER STREET WRAP: Likely to Help Established Cos.
Source: BFW (Bloomberg First Word)
Tickers
LC US (LendingClub Corp)
ONDK US (On Deck Capital Inc)
PYPL US (PayPal Holdings Inc)
BK US (Bank of New York Mellon Corp/The)
GS US (Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The)
People
Bradley Berning (Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC)
Edward Mills (Friedman Billings Ramsey & Co Inc)
Ian Katz (Capital Alpha Partners LLC)
Thomas Curry (TREAS Office of The Comptroller of The Currency)
To de-activate this alert, click here
UUID: 7947283
(Bloomberg) -- Most analysts see OCC’s plans to start accepting applications from fintech cos. for special charter as positive for established cos. like LendingClub, On Deck, though details still unclear.
Alert: HALISTER1- Charter would subject fintechs to federal banking rules, including anti-money laundering controls, consumer protections
- See OCC Comptroller Thomas Curry’s announcement
- Sees charter as next step in industry’s "maturation"; shows further regulatory "acceptance"; may end regulatory arbitrage, remove some threat of CFPB action, help fintech cos. build relationships with other banks
- Removes risk of CFPB being primary regulator; insulates chartered firms from Madden/Midland (case on usury caps)
- Sees charter as positive for LC, ONDK as larger marketplace lenders are "strongly positioned," given greater scale/compliance investments relative to smaller competitors, though "devil" is in details as it’s unclear what standards fintech firms will be held to; notes OCC asks for public comment
- Likely positive for LC (buy) as co. wouldn’t have to pay WebBank to originate loans, which could free up ~$10m-$20m of Ebitda per year
- Also potential positive for PYPL (buy) as co. could offer FDIC insured deposits, allowing it to capture all customer transactions instead of just a few per month; may be good for millennials who want to shift to "greater universal digital wallet functionality"
- “Notable questions" include: Whether OCC will maintain course under Trump Administration, especially given Curry’s expected departure in 1H; whether opposition from state regulators (like N.Y. DFS) will shift federal response; how comments will influence
- While effort is "positive step" toward federal clarity, sees established cos. with existing state licenses, bank partnerships as unlikely to pursue charter
- OCC’s accepting comments until Jan. 15 suggests licensure may not begin until 2H
- While there’s been "some debate" about whether fintech cos. would even want charter, Capital Alpha views larger cos. as eventually seeking to deal with only one regulator, even if it’s "a tough one," vs working through all the different states
- Cites fintech exec remark post-Curry’ speech that the word "preemption" describes why fintech co. would seek national charter
- Notes Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) said it’s "deeply concerned" non-bank online lenders’ lack of oversight has provided them with regulatory "advantages" vs community banks, while putting consumers/financial system at risk; Curry’s term expires in April, with no guarantee about successor
- Earlier, A Look Inside Wall Street’s Innovation Labs
- Peeks into finthech at cos. including JPMorgan, BNY Mellon, Goldman
- Dec. 2, States Should Regulate Fintechs, Not the OCC, Says N.Y. DFS
- Dec. 2, Marketplace Lenders May Not Seek Fintech Charters: Compass Point
Source: BFW (Bloomberg First Word)
Tickers
LC US (LendingClub Corp)
ONDK US (On Deck Capital Inc)
PYPL US (PayPal Holdings Inc)
BK US (Bank of New York Mellon Corp/The)
GS US (Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The)
People
Bradley Berning (Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC)
Edward Mills (Friedman Billings Ramsey & Co Inc)
Ian Katz (Capital Alpha Partners LLC)
Thomas Curry (TREAS Office of The Comptroller of The Currency)
To de-activate this alert, click here
UUID: 7947283