ROUNDUP: A Too-Close-to-Call Italy Vote May Pressure BTPs, Euro
(Bloomberg) -- Italian bonds, stocks and the euro may face downside pressure in the event of a “no” vote at the nation’s constitutional referendum to be held Dec. 4.
- While such an outcome is unlikely to trigger early elections, it could weigh on the already weak Italian growth and delay banking reforms, strategists and economists say
- Goldman Sachs sees ~60% chances of a “yes” vote; others banks including UBS, UniCredit say the result is too close to call
- Fitch, Moody’s also see risks from the referendum
- Goldman Sachs
- Assigns a slightly higher chance (60%) to the reforms passing than the polls presently suggest, analysts including Francesco Garzarelli write in client note
- Mentions a number of factors which should play in favor of a “yes” vote, including an expansionary 2017 budget that should be outlined in October
- Bond spreads would “stay in check” even if constitutional reforms are rejected as the ECB is expected to continue its QE beyond March 2017
- Still, until opinion polls turn to suggest that the “yes” camp is gaining ground, Italian sovereign risk should continue to be priced above Spain’s
- Take a more negative stance on Italian banks; if the “no” vote prevails, sees a weakened center-left government muddling through until early 2018, possibly without Renzi at the helm
- Chances of successful market-driven recapitalizations of the weaker Italian retail banks, which are already likely to be pushed into 2017, would diminish substantially
- Assigns 60% chance to Renzi’s resignation conditional on a defeat at the referendum
- UBS
- Based on recent opinion polls, the outcome is too close to call, team including Felix Huefner, Nishay Patel say in client note
- If the referendum is voted down, political uncertainty increases and reform progress takes a step back
- For Italian banks, risks are positively skewed as the upside in a “normalization” scenario supported by a “yes” vote outweighs the limited downside in a more negative scenario potentially triggered by a “no” vote
- Favors banks with excess capital and discounted valuation, such as buy-rated Creval and BPER; also has a buy rating on Intesa
- In event of a “yes” vote, expects 10-year Italy- Germany bond spread to initially tighten by 5-10bps while a “no” vote is likely to result in a widening to over 155bps
- The political backdrop in Spain is currently more favorable than in Italy, and the bank maintains a preference of being long 10Y Spain versus Italy; also recommends hedging against a potential escalation of Italian risks by selling 10Y Italy vs U.S. Treasuries, targeting 0 bps
- HSBC
- Renzi has played down resignation talk recently but the damage might have already been done as he would be under significant pressure in event of a “no” vote, economists including Fabio Balboni write in client note
- A “yes” vote could take Italy’s 10Y yield flat with Spain initially, but Italy’s underperformance should continue in the medium term because of low growth and concerns over the banks
- A “no” vote could see the 10-year spread gap widen to over 40bps but the knee-jerk reaction should be limited by ECB and dip-buying
- Vote has the potential to create volatility in equities, but not on the scale of the U.K.’s EU membership referendum; a “no” vote combined with PM Renzi standing down may lead to a significant risk-off event for Italy, with repercussions for wider Europe
- Says EUR should be relatively indifferent to any outcome, although risks may be biased slightly to the downside in the near term, given that little political risk premium is priced in
- Nomura
- Market reaction is likely to be asymmetric and much bigger in the case of a “no” vote with Italian bonds and EUR likely to sell off on the result, economists including Anna Titareva and Charles St-Arnaud write in client note
- Still, the rejection of constitutional reforms is unlikely to trigger an election; this means that the current government is likely to continue until the expected election in 2018 and that any market overreaction is likely to be partly removed in the weeks following the referendum
- A positive outcome to the referendum would reduce political uncertainty, which could lead to a compression of spreads between Italian and Spanish bonds through a small rally in Italian rates
- UniCredit
- The referendum outcome remains too close to call, economist Loredana Federico says in client note
- Notes that the “no” camp hasn’t gained further significant ground in recent weeks as the Five Star Movement has been facing a slight decline in popularity due to the resignation of several key members of Rome’s municipal government and the mounting problems of Rome’s new mayor
- Renzi changing his communication strategy and shifting the focus from himself could also play in favor of a “yes” vote
- Still, the political situation remains very fluid, and the risk that the vote might become a plebiscite on government remains high
- In event of a “no” vote, sees the installation of a caretaker government, led by a person of high standing, as the most probable outcome; an early-election scenario, in spring 2017, remains the least likely one
- Any transitional government, or a weakened Renzi government wouldn’t be positive for the country in the near term as reforms are likely to progress slowly; economic activity is also likely to remain weak and a confidence shock will negatively affect firms’ and households’ behavior
- Barclays
- In event of a “yes” vote, doesn’t expect an implementation of additional meaningful structural reforms, as the government would probably want to avoid costly political decisions before the next round of general elections that should be held no later than May 2018, economist Fabio Fois says in client note
- With a “no” vote, expect PM Renzi to resign; snap elections are unlikely to be called immediately after, as they would most likely lead to a hung Parliament
- Would expect President of the Republic Mattarella to sound out political leaders’ willingness to form a temporary govt led by a PM, who could still be Renzi, charged with improving the voting system in order to minimize the risk that no political party is able to secure an outright majority in both chambers
Alert:
HALISTER1Source: BFW (Bloomberg First Word)
Tickers UCG IM (UniCredit SpA)
People Anna Titareva (Nomura Holdings Inc)
Charles St-Arnaud (Nomura Holdings Inc)
Fabio Balboni (HSBC Securities Inc)
Fabio Fois (Barclays PLC)
Felix Huefner (UBS Asset Management Japan Ltd)
To de-activate this alert, click
hereUUID: 7947283